
This study investigated how varying levels of the Gestalt principle of continuity in GUI elements affect user perception and cognitive load. Grounded in the theory that our perception favors continuous forms to reduce mental effort, the research aimed to identify if an "optimal" level of continuity exists for intuitive design.
A quantitative study was conducted with 14 participants who evaluated five GUI graphics representing a standard settings interface. These visuals were systematically varied across five levels of continuity, ranging from very low to highest. Participants rated each stimulus on a 5-point Likert scale across three metrics: perceived flow, difficulty of use, and overall intuitiveness.
Multiple linear regression analysis revealed a strong and statistically significant correlation (R2 =.81, p<.001) between these variables.
The data confirmed the hypothesis that a balanced-mid level of continuity optimized the user experience, showing the strongest relationship between flow and intuitiveness. These findings suggest that an intermediate level of continuity minimizes cognitive effort, providing actionable guidelines for designers.












Finding the Middle Ground: The results confirm that an intermediate level of continuity optimizes the user experience, rather than simply maximizing or minimizing it.
Usability Guidelines: Designers should consciously calibrate the degree of continuity in elements like groupings and connections to create more efficient interfaces.
High-Stakes Application: These findings are particularly relevant for medical software and complex control systems where reducing cognitive strain is paramount to safety and performance.